I have struggled with developing a healthy view of femininity for most of my life. I am determined and intelligent and capable of accomplishing many things and of doing them well; my family refers to me as "a mover and a shaker", whatever that means. Yet, despite my qualifications, intellect, and abilities, I can't seem to find my place within the church. It doesn't make sense, really. Each time I try to minister within the body, I cannot get past the gender alarm that screeches, "She's a woman! She shouldn't be allowed to teach men or hold office within the church!" and every time I have asked why I have gotten essentially the same answer, Genesis 3:1-7. Eve fell prey to the serpent's crafty plan and therefore all women should not be trusted with teaching men or in church office. Some gate-keepers gave more carefully worded arguments supported by great theological minds, but essentially it always comes down to this passage in Genesis, the beginning of the powerful, yet powerless woman.
I have heard almost every variation of this argument, but I know that at least one response to this post will still surprise me. Yet, what these people miss is the major implication of that Genesis 3 story: women were made to be powerful influencers.
God made Adam from dust, but Eve He made from bone. He created her to be complex and strong, to give structure to order, to be resilient, to bear a load and be a companion. The serpent picked his target well in the garden. He picked the one that shared a name with God, "Help-Meet", the one who would carry life and vitality within her womb. He picked the one who would think more of her mate than of herself. Many preachers defame Eve saying that she was stupid and couldn't even remember God's ONLY commandment correctly. They don't give her the benefit of the doubt, but I would like to. I have often wondered why Eve gave the fruit to Adam to eat and why she didn't realize what she had done before giving it to him. The answer is there in verse 6, "So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate." Putting myself in Eve's shoes, I would think I am giving my husband the best thing I could find. Giving him food that was good for him. Her thought was of her husband and the serpent exploited her natural tendency. The serpent knew that Eve would be seeking Adam's good and knew that was his way in. They ate the forbidden fruit, broke God's law, and sin entered the world. Most preachers ignore this fact, but not in an obvious way. The crafty serpent deceives them as well. Every sermon I have heard on sin entering the world grossly misrepresents what really happened, and yet it took me 18 years to see it for what it really is. Most preachers will indicate that Eve began sinning before the act of eating the fruit. They will argue that Eve "lusted" after the fruit and in so doing, she sinned. But here is the problem, sin didn't begin with lust, it began with disobedience. God never said that they could not look at the tree or admire it, He simply said not to eat of it. And that is what they did, in disobedience. Am I saying that Eve played no role in disobeying God? No. Am I saying that she was a victim of Satan's exploitation of her God-given desires to give her husband the best she could find? Yes. Sin did not originate with humans, that was Satan's creation, he just found a way to pass it along and ruin God's plan. Or at least he made his best effort.
I find that Satan's oppression of women extends far beyond Genesis 3 though. Throughout history, women have been degraded, chained, used, hated, and slapped around. Some would argue that the church is to blame for this, but I do not agree. I think they miss the true culprit behind this misogynistic mindset: Satan. He picked his target in the garden; a way to get at God via the one who shared His name. And the assault continues to this day. Eating disorders, depression, body image, violence against women, equal rights/equal pay, sexual harassment, these are just a few of the ways Satan tries to keep woman, "Help-meet", from knowing her true name. Sadly, these efforts do not stop at church doors. Satan uses Eve's history, the one thing that would stop us in our tracks, to stop us from serving God to our fullest in the church. We agree, saying that the church is right and we shouldn't be trusted, completely forgetting that we have been redeemed from that past.
I think that is why Satan has us running scared. He doesn't want us to live in light of that redemption because if we did, we would be a formidable foe.
I think I am beginning to understand femininity and how beautifully it fits within the body of Christ, the problem it seems, is with the body. It's like only using the right side and letting the left just sit there, useless, burdensome, and wasting. I see so many godly, gifted women in the church who have been told that it's not their place to teach men or hold office, when in their careers they lead (men and women) dynamically. But to the use of these gifts, the church tells them no. Because you are a woman.
I hope and pray that God will begin changing the hearts of church leaders to embrace His name bearers and the distinctly feminine gifts God has given them.
Grateful
-
Today, October 21, 2023, is a significant day for me. Fourteen years ago
today I was in my oncologists' office for one final, definitive test, when
th...
Read "Why Not Women" (by David Joel Hamilton and Loren Conningham- two MEN!) for more insight. You are right on, and the oppression of women ministering in the church is NOT Biblical. Mom has the book. Goes into the original NT Greek and OT Hebrew translations and it will give you so much more insight!
ReplyDeleteJust out of curiosity, how do you explain 1 Timothy 2?
ReplyDeleteDISCLAIMER: I have no point to prove, I am merely interested in discussion and dialogue. I am not trying to stir up some heated argument in which I point out all the ways you are wrong. I simply like to know people's thoughts. Thanks.
Oh, Courtney too, I sometimes wonder what is being taught about Genesis 2 in seminary. The original Hebrew gives no indication that woman is lesser than man. I got some help with this: http://net.bible.org/#!bible/Genesis+2
ReplyDeletetn Traditionally “helper.” The English word “helper,” because it can connote so many different ideas, does not accurately convey the connotation of the Hebrew word עֵזֶר (’ezer). Usage of the Hebrew term does not suggest a subordinate role, a connotation which English “helper” can have. In the Bible God is frequently described as the “helper,” the one who does for us what we cannot do for ourselves, the one who meets our needs. In this context the word seems to express the idea of an “indispensable companion.” The woman would supply what the man was lacking in the design of creation and logically it would follow that the man would supply what she was lacking, although that is not stated here. See further M. L. Rosenzweig, “A Helper Equal to Him,” Jud 139 (1986): 277-80.
In modern day English, if you need help with your math homework, do you go to someone who knows the same you do, or someone who knows more than you? Or if you have trouble with a bully, you find someone bigger and stronger than you, right? The psalmist used this word when he said, "I lift up my eyes to the hills- where does my help come from? My help comes from the Lord, the Maker of heaven and earth."
57 tn The Hebrew expression כְּנֶגְדּוֹ (kÿnegdo) literally means “according to the opposite of him.” Translations such as “suitable [for]” (NASB, NIV), “matching,” “corresponding to” all capture the idea. (Translations that render the phrase simply “partner” [cf. NEB, NRSV], while not totally inaccurate, do not reflect the nuance of correspondence and/or suitability.) The man’s form and nature are matched by the woman’s as she reflects him and complements him. Together they correspond. In short, this prepositional phrase indicates that she has everything that God had invested in him.
Woman was not created to serve Adam, but to serve WITH him.
This is excellent Courtney. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteTo Vicatella: You raise a very good point and I have thought about a response, but not a very good one to be perfectly honest. I would need extensive time to study that passage, because I know certain things about the Greek translation and changing of voice and that is a very contentious passage anyway (specifically vs.15) that has caused quiet a stir in evangelical churches over the years.
ReplyDeleteSo allow me time to put together an appropriate response that is equal to the question.
Thank you for asking it.
Hello. So good to know you through your profile on the blogger. I am also glad to stop by your blog "Outliers Inc" and the post on it " The woman in Me and the Church". Very thoughtful post on Biblical understanding of woman's role in the Church. I fully agree with you as far as the women role in the Church is concern but your interpretation of Eve plugging the fruit and giving to Adam is very interesting. Thank you for this thought provoking write up. Well I would like to share with you and opportunity to come to Mumbai, India to work with us in the slums of Mumbai among poorest of poor to share the good news of Jesus Christ and to give them new hope, life and purpose. I am in the Pastoral ministry for last 34yrs in the great city of Mumbai a city with great contrast where richest of rich and the poorest of poor live. We reachout to the poorest of poor with the love of Christ to bring healing to the broken hearted. We also encourage young people as well as adults from the West to come to Mumbai to work with us during their summer vacation. We would love to have you come to Mumbai with your friends to work with us during your summer vacation. I am sure with your studies in the Social Work it would be of great help to work with us in the slums of Mumbai in helping us to transforming the lives of the poorest of poor socially and spiritually. My email id is: dhwankhede(at)gmail(dot)com and my name is Diwakar Wankhede. Looking forward to hear from you very soon
ReplyDelete